There appears to be a production issue in the creation of the PDF version of this DIS. Many of the mathematical formulas that define the spreadsheet functions are illegible, and all of them are of low quality. For example, 3.17.7.24, 3.17.7.32, 3.17.7.38, etc.

For example:
3.17.7.32 BINOMDIST on page 2558. What power is (1-p) raised to

3.17.7.38 CHITEST on page 2565, what is the subscript on A
3.17..7.233 NEGBINOMDIST on page 2721, what is p’ p-rime a first derivitive of p or a degenerate p^r

Provide higher resolution of the mathematical equations.

Throughout Part 4, Section 03.17.07

TE

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment CA-0047 (Modified: 2007-11-15) Yes, not only are these formulas hard to read, they don’t scale at all well. These formulas will be replaced by the equivalent WordprocessingML equations. Some examples of the current formulas and their corresponding replacements using equivalent WordprocessingML are as follows: 3.17.7.2 ACCRINT = × × =1 3.17.7.24 BESSELJ = -1 ! + + 1 2 +2 =0 3.17.7.206 MDURATION = 1 + Similar Comments: CL-0144 , CO-0152 , DK-0089 , ECMA-0032 , FR-0353 , FR-0412 , FR-0452 , GB-0370 , GB-0400 , US-0197 , US- 0283