This algorithm description fails to specify the encoding of the input password. The described algorithms make use of byte-level manipulations which depend on the machine architecture (big endian versus little endian). So it is necessary that all byte ordering assumptions be made explicit.

Make the byte ordering assumptions explicit, both for the input password and the processing steps, so as to allow cross-platform interoperability.

2.15.1.28 te

1158(1165)

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment CO-0098 (Modified: 2008-01-03) Agreed; the following changes will be made to make this assumption explicit in each algorithm: Part 4, §2.15.1.28, page 1,158, line 15: First, the UTF-16 encoded password shall be hashed using the following algorithm . The following steps assume that all words are unsigned, the word size is two bytes, and that bit-level SHL/SHR operations shift in the direction of the highest-order and lowest-order bit, respectively. [Example: 0x61 SHR 1 is 0xC2, as 01100001 shifted one position in the direction of its highest-order bit is 11000010. end example] : Similar Comments: BR-0006 , CL-0091 , CZ-0053 , DE-0088 , GB-0220 , GH-0009 , GR-0027 , IN-0075 , IR-0013 , MY-0021 , PT-0039 , US-0052 , UY-0017 , VE-0018