The definition seem to try and deliver two definition of the same thing, which is confusing, It both try and define Office Open XML as a special way to package files, and rendition, which imply behaviour.

Need clarification of definition

Page 7
line 1-3 Part 1
Section 4

Ed

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment DK-0070 (Modified: 2008-01-04) Agreed; we will change the definition to read as follows: Office Open XML document A package containing ZIP items as required by, and satisfying Parts 1 and 4 of, this Standard. A rendition of a data stream formatted using the wordprocessing, spreadsheet, or presentation ML and its related MLs as described in Parts 1 and 4 of this Standard. Such a document is represented as a package as described in Part 2 of this Standard . Similar Comments: FR-0007 , GB-0032 , KE-0077 , PT-0025 , US-0260

Tag and Go

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)