Is this recommending that a non-public, internal-only, work-for-hire application author create "publicly available documentation" on what subset of the standard it supports The business relationship between the software author and his customer should not be a concern of this standard.

Change to read, "a software application should be accompanied by documentation…"

lines 33-34 Part 1, Section 2.6 "Interoperability Guidelines"

ed

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment FR-0004 (Modified: 2007-12-07) Agreed; the following change will be made to Part 1, ยง2.6, page 3, line 33: For the guidelines to be meaningful, a software application should be accompanied by publicly available documentation that describes what subset of this Standard it supports. Similar Comments: DE-0122 , DK-0066 , GB-0026 , JP-0024 , KE-0015 , PT-0022 , US-0255

Tag and Go

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)