The description of ‘SKIPIF’ is inconsistent with itself (’SKIPIF’ vs ‘SKIP’).
Resolve the contradiction.
page 1560, lines 6&8 Part 4, Section 2.16.5.65 SKIPIF
te
Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment FR-0299 (Modified: 2007-12-07) Agreed; the resolution to this comment is included in that for comments DE-0052 and FR-0074, which resulted in the complete replacement of the syntax in Part 4, §2.16.1, pages 14871489 by one defined using the notation from EBNF (as defined in ISO/IEC 14977:1996). Fixing the original syntax would have resulted in the following changes to Part 4, §2.16.5.65, page 1,560, line 8: 2.16.5.65 SKIPIF Syntax: SKIP IF Expression-1 Operator Expression-2 Expression-1: expression Expression-2: expression However, given the rewrite of the whole syntax, this change was incorporated in the new syntax, as follows: 2.16.5.65 SKIPIF Syntax: SKIP IF Expression-1 Operator Expression-2 comparison Expression-1: expression Expression-2: expression where comparison= expression, comparison-operator, expression ; comparison-operator= "=" | "<>" | "<" | "<=" | ">" | ">=" ; Similar Comments: BR-0023 ,
