The artwork provided here is of poor quality providing neither intended scale, spacing, color depth, etc. A small example diagram is an insufficient definition. For example, are the dimensions of the borders absolute Or do they scale with page size Also, some of the images, such as ‘apples’ or ‘balloons3Colors’ show copying artifacts, where extraneous lines or blotches appear.

Provide full normative definitions for these graphical elements. Also, for informative purposes, these graphics may be provided in standalone file form, preferably in a scalable graphics format like SVG.

- Part 4, Section 2.18.4 ST_Border (Border Styles)

te

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment FR-0321 (Modified: 2008-01-13) Agreed; the following changes will be made: The following text will be added to Part 4, §2.18.4, page 1,631, below line 19: For art borders, each border definition is specified by the combination of eight images, as follows: For the edge borders (top, bottom, left, and right), the border image is repeated as necessary to span the distance between the two intersecting corners. Electronic definitions of each piece of border art are included in Annex G. Each border in Part 4, §2.18.4 will be rewritten in the following consistent style (using two examples to illustrate): Enumeration Value Description apples (Apples Art Border) Specifies an art border using the following images: All Sides: moons (Moon Art Border) Specifies an art border using the following images: Top: Bottom: Left: Right: Top Left: Top Right: Bottom Left: Bottom Right: A new Annex will be added to Part 4, which provides electronic copies of each component of each border in ISO 15948 (PNG) format. The concern raised by CO-0126 about extensibility is addressed in the response to a set of comments that include AU-0021, CA-0028, and CL-0127. Similar Comments: BR-0026 , CA-0027 , CL-0126 , CO-0126 , CZ-0029 , DE-0094 , DK-0023 , DK-0141 , ECMA-0041 , GB-0271 , IR- 0032 , KE-0033 , PT-0066 , US-0048 , US-0072 , VE-0030 , VE-0031

Tag and Go

1 Comment

  1. hAl September 29, 2007 @ 9:35 am

    Dupe of Ecma 41

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)