The reference to the definition of the space operator is broken (’§0′).

Revise the text to address this comment

3.17.2 [p2508, 16, 17]

te

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment GB-0360 (Modified: 2007-11-15) Agreed; these broken forward references will be fixed. The only ones found are in Part 4, §3.17.2, lines 16 (operators) and 27 (space operator). These should both go to §3.17.2.2. Similar Comments: CA-0042 , ECMA-0074 , FR-0431 , FR-0432 , US-0246 , US-0247

Tag and Go

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)