The described processing steps are ambiguous. In particular SHR and SHL give different results on different machines and with signed and unsigned values

Describe the hash algorithm in a platform independent manner.

pg 1159, lines 6-9 Part 4, Section 2.15.1.28

te

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment US-0054 (Modified: 2008-01-13) Agreed; to ensure this process is described in a platform-independent manner, the following changes will be made in Part 4, ยง2.15.1.28, page 1,158, line 15: The following steps assume that all words are unsigned, the word size is two bytes, and that bit-level SHL/SHR operations shift in the direction of the highest-order and lowest-order bit, respectively. [Example: 0x61 SHR 1 is 0xC2, as 01100001 shifted one position in the direction of its highest-order bit is 11000010. end example] First, t T he password shall be hashed using the following algorithm: Similar Comments: BR-0005 , CA-0017 , DK-0158 , GB-0222 , IR-0014 , KE-0022 , PT-0041 ,

Tag and Go

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)