Border styles is not fully defined (e.g missing height, width, color-depth, orientation). The style basicThinLine describes behavior for horizontal, vertical and corner scenarios but many styles (e.g babyRattle, balloonsHotair, etc) provide no such details. The problem with this is that a single style can be interpreted differently by different vendors/implementors. Also, these styles provide no generality.

Provide full definition for each border styles or drop they.

pages 1631-1681 Part 4, Section 2.18.4 ST_Border (Border Styles)

te

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment VE-0030 (Modified: 2008-01-13) Agreed; the following changes will be made: The following text will be added to Part 4, §2.18.4, page 1,631, below line 19: For art borders, each border definition is specified by the combination of eight images, as follows: For the edge borders (top, bottom, left, and right), the border image is repeated as necessary to span the distance between the two intersecting corners. Electronic definitions of each piece of border art are included in Annex G. Each border in Part 4, §2.18.4 will be rewritten in the following consistent style (using two examples to illustrate): Enumeration Value Description apples (Apples Art Border) Specifies an art border using the following images: All Sides: … moons (Moon Art Border) Specifies an art border using the following images: Top: Bottom: Left: Right: Top Left: Top Right: Bottom Left: Bottom Right: A new Annex will be added to Part 4, which provides electronic copies of each component of each border in ISO 15948 (PNG) format. The concern raised by CO-0126 about extensibility is addressed in the response to a set of comments that include AU-0021, CA-0028, and CL-0127. Similar Comments: BR-0026 , CA-0027 , CL-0126 , CO-0126 , CZ-0029 , DE-0094 , DK-0023 , DK-0141 , ECMA-0041 , FR-0321 , GB- 0271 , IR-0032 , KE-0033 , PT-0066 , US-0048 , US-0072 , VE-0031