The meaning of para 2 is unclear. What is "ignored content" in this context. It is strongly desired that any requirements in the specification which causes renaming and removal of parts be made user- and application- optional.

Clarify para 2. No concrete suggestion is possible in the absence of a clear understanding of the behaviour.

Para 2 Part 2, s8.3.5

ed

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment AU-0010 (Modified: 2008-01-04) Agreed; the text should not suggest that this information should not be preserved. The following changes will be made: Part 2, §8.3.5, page 21, lines 34­37: Consumers shall process relationship markup in a manner that conforms to Part 5: “Markup Compatibility and Extensibility”. Producers editing relationships based on this version of the relationship markup specification shall not preserve any ignored content, regardless of the presence of any preservation attributes as defined in Part 5: “Markup Compatibility and Extensibility”. [M1.31] Part 2, §H.1, page 95, row M1.31: M1.31 Consumers shall process relationship markup in a manner that conforms to Part 5: “Markup Compatibility and Extensibility”. Producers editing relationships based on this version of the relationship markup specification shall not preserve any ignored content, regardless of the presence of any preservation attributes as defined in Part 5: “Markup Compatibility and Extensibility”. 8.3.5 × ×