This clause has two references to a nonexistent section (’§0′).

Fix the reference and ensure that no cascading effect takes place Suggest the reference to be: 3.17.2.2

Part 4, Section 03.17.02

ED

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment CA-0042 (Modified: 2007-11-15) Agreed; these broken forward references will be fixed. The only ones found are in Part 4, §3.17.2, lines 16 (operators) and 27 (space operator). These should both go to §3.17.2.2. Similar Comments: ECMA-0074 , FR-0431 , FR-0432 , GB-0360 , US-0246 , US-0247

Tag and Go

No Comments

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)