The phrase “well-defined naming guidelines” is confusing since the ECMA-376 specification uses “guidance” as an informative marking of the specification.

Suggest using “naming rules” as an alternative

Page 1
Line 9 Part 2
Section 1

Ed

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment DK-0073 (Modified: 2007-11-15) Agreed; the following change will be made to Part 2, §1, page 1, lines 8­9: Parts have content types and are uniquely identified using the well-defined naming guidelines rules provided in this Open Packaging specification. Similar Comments: DE-0129 , FR-0029 , GB-0051 , PT-0031 , US-0268

Tag and Go

1 Comment

  1. hAl October 25, 2007 @ 12:57 pm

    dupe of GB 51

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)