The definition refer to " one ot two Latin letter" without any strict definition what is meant by .. "Latin letters"
This lead to possible ambiguously interpretation of the rules. As the means of definitions doesn’t offer any explanation or any direct hint of the actual notation, it should be clarified.
This lead to possible ambiguously interpretation of the rules. As the means of definitions doesn’t offer any explanation or any direct hint of the actual notation, it should be clarified.
Suggest definition of "Latin Letters".
Page 1689
line 17 Part 4
Section 2.16.1
Ed
Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment DK-0119 (Modified: 2007-12-21) Agreed; the resolution to this comment is included in that for comments DE-0052 and FR-0074, which resulted in the complete replacement of the syntax in Part 4, §2.16.1, pages 14871489 by one defined using the notation from EBNF (as defined in ISO/IEC 14977:1996). Fixing the original syntax would have resulted in the following changes to Part 4, §2.16.1, page 1,489, lines 1517: field-switch-character: ! any one or two Latin letters of the following: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z However, given the rewrite of the whole syntax, this change was incorporated in the new syntax, as follows: field-specific-switch= "\", character, [character], [field-argument] ; (* no whitespace is permitted after the backslash, also see definition of each field in §2.16.5 *) character= as defined by the production Char in the XML 1.0 specification, §2.2. field-argument= text | double-quote, text, double-quote ; text= character, {character} ; double-quote= ‘ " ‘ ; (* one double-quote character *) Similar Comments: BR-0014 , CA-0021 , DE-0068 , FR-0195 , GB-0240 , US-0248
