In CONVERT, Pica (1/72") should be Point (1/72").

Correct this.

Part 4, 3.17.7.48

ed

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment ECMA-0030 (Modified: 2007-12-07) Agreed; the value for pica is incorrectly stated in the CONVERT function definition. The unit name is specified as “pica” but the conversion factor for “point” is given. The following changes will be made to Part 4, ยง3.17.7.48, page 2,573, line 2: Distance Unit String Meaning ang Angstrom ft Foot in Inch m Meter mi Statute mile Nmi Nautical mile Pica Pica Point (1/72 inch) yd Yard

Tag and Go

No Comments

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)