The provided equations are blurred, to the point of being almost unreadable.

Provide clean equations.

page 2820, line 15, and page 2821, lines 1&3 Part 4, Section 3.17.7.343 WEIBULL

ed

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment FR-0353 (Modified: 2007-11-15) Yes, not only are these formulas hard to read, they don’t scale at all well. These formulas will be replaced by the equivalent WordprocessingML equations. Some examples of the current formulas and their corresponding replacements using equivalent WordprocessingML are as follows: 3.17.7.2 ACCRINT = × × =1 3.17.7.24 BESSELJ = -1 ! + + 1 2 +2 =0 3.17.7.206 MDURATION = 1 + Similar Comments: CA-0047 , CL-0144 , CO-0152 , DK-0089 , ECMA-0032 , FR-0412 , FR-0452 , GB-0370 , GB-0400 , US-0197 , US- 0283

Tag and Go

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)