this comment number seems to be used in error

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment FR-0560 (Modified: 2008-01-04) Thank you for this comment, although it is not clear if any response is required. We have requested further clarification but have still not gotten a response. As such, we have no proposed changes to DIS 29500 to address this issue. Similar Comments: FR-0559 ,

Tag and Go

No Comments

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

  • Could apply to ODF (1)
  • Does not require fixing (1)
  • Dupe (663)
  • Feature Request (2)
  • Fluff (11)
  • Has Dupes (42)
  • Has ECMA Response (1)
  • Issue of Substance (11)
  • Just fix it (21)
  • Legal Issue (5)
  • Multiple Comments (5)
  • Needs Further Review (1)
  • Non-technical (1)
  • Positive Comment (2)
  • Process Improvement (2)
  • Proprietary Information (2)
  • Security Issue (1)
  • Undefined Concepts (6)
  • Wrecking Amendment (5)
  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)
  • Application Defined (25)
  • Big Changes Proposed (136)
  • Deprecated (16)
  • Just Plain Silly (54)
  • Trivial Fix Done (253)
  • Yes but No (99)

  • Recent Comments

  • Login