Why are "contentTypes" as summarized in Table 10-1 different from MIME content types

If it is really different, choose a different name.

Part 2 Clause 10 Table 10-1

te

Proposed Disposition of DIS 29500 Comment JP-0044 (Modified: 2008-01-09) The "contentType" property semantics are different than the MIME type semantics; they are from different domains. The contentType property will be removed from Table 10.1. The following change will be made: Part 2, §10, page 36, Table 10-1: Property Domain Description category Open Packaging Conventions A categorization of the content of this package. [Example: Example values for this property might include: Resume, Letter, Financial Forecast, Proposal, Technical Presentation, and so on. This value might be used by an application's user interface to facilitate navigation of a large set of documents. end example] contentStatus Open Packaging Conventions The status of the content. [Example: Values might include "Draft", "Reviewed", and "Final". end example] contentType Open Packaging Conventions The type of content represented, generally defined by a specific use and intended audience. [Example: Values might include "Whitepaper", "Security Bulletin", and "Exam". end example] [Note: This property is distinct from MIME content types as defined in RFC 2616. end note] created Dublin Core Date of creation of the resource. creator Dublin Core An entity primarily responsible for making the content of the resource. description Dublin Core An explanation of the content of the resource. [Example: Values might include an abstract, table of contents, reference to a graphical representation of content, and a free-text account of the content. end example] identifier Dublin Core An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context. Part 2, §10, page 38, line 0, diagram: Remove the contentType box from the diagram for CT_coreProperties. Part 2, §10, page 38, lines 2­15: Example 10­1. Core properties markup An example of a core properties part is illustrated by this example: <coreProperties xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/metadata/ core-properties" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <dc:creator>Alan Shen</dc:creator> <dcterms:created xsi:type="dcterms:W3CDTF"> 2005-06-12 </dcterms:created> <contentType>Functional Specification</contentType> <dc:title>OPC Core Properties</dc:title> Part 2, §10, page 38, line 0, diagram: Remove contentType from the associated schema.

Tag and Go

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  • Argentina (1)
  • Australia (30)
  • Austria (1)
  • Belgium (1)
  • Brazil (64)
  • Bulgaria (3)
  • Canada (79)
  • Chile (217)
  • China (1)
  • Colombia (237)
  • Czech Republic (75)
  • Denmark (168)
  • Ecma (76)
  • Ecuador (1)
  • Finland (15)
  • France (592)
  • Germany (162)
  • Ghana (12)
  • Greece (113)
  • India (82)
  • Iran (58)
  • Ireland (12)
  • Israel (33)
  • Italy (2)
  • Japan (82)
  • Jordan (1)
  • Kenya (81)
  • Malaysia (23)
  • Malta (5)
  • Mexico (7)
  • New Zealand (54)
  • Norway (12)
  • Peru (10)
  • Philippines (7)
  • Poland (4)
  • Portugal (118)
  • Singapore (2)
  • South Africa (17)
  • South Korea (25)
  • Spain (1)
  • Switzerland (19)
  • Thailand (1)
  • Tunisia (3)
  • Turkey (1)
  • UK (635)
  • Uruguay (18)
  • USA (288)
  • Venezuela (73)